chown -R exclude some directory

Question

I want to exclude some large content directory

I'm Using it to chown Directory

chown -R admin /home/admin/web/public_html

is there anyway to exclude a subdirectory under html

Like:

chown -R admin exclude=/home/admin/web/public_html/content /home/admin/web/public_html

Something like that

Thanks

Answer 1

chown -R admin $(ls -I content)

ls -I will list all except specified pattern.

Answer 2

In Linux the most general tool to do something to files meeting some criteria is find. Few other answers base on the find … | xargs … idea, which is robust only if it uses null-terminated strings. This means find … -print0 | xargs -0 …, but these options are not required by POSIX.

With POSIX find it's usually better to use -exec than to pipe to xargs. Personally I prefer -exec even if I can safely use xargs. Knowing that -exec is also a test, so it can be used to build custom tests (example), it's good to be familiar with it anyway; and then there is no reason not to use it instead of xargs. The real power of xargs is its ability to parse strings with quotes and escaped characters; but this is hardly ever useful when reading from find, almost always it's harmful. Non-POSIX options like -0 and --no-run-if-empty can make xargs a good companion of find … -print0, but still the good POSIX -exec is (almost?) always at least as good.

Your problem can be solved by

find /home/admin/web/public_html \
   -path /home/admin/web/public_html/content -prune \
   -o -exec chown admin {} +

It works like this: if the path is …/content then do not descend into it (-prune); otherwise (-o) execute chown admin on the file (note: directory is also a file).

Notes:

• Do not use chown -R here. The first file tested is /home/admin/web/public_html and if you use chown -R on it then nothing will be excluded.

• -exec chown … {} + can and will pass multiple paths to chown, while -exec chown … {} \; would pass just one (so there would be one chown spawned per file). The syntax with + reduces the number of spawned chown processes, this speeds things up. Even then find will spawn more than one chown process if the number of files is too large for a single command line (compare "argument list too long"). Note it works because chown can take multiple paths; some tools cannot and for them the syntax with + is out of the question.

• -path matches against the entire path. The path is what find thinks the path is, not necessarily the canonical path. If the starting path is /home/admin/web/public_html then every path tested will start with this string; but if the starting path is ./ then every path tested will start with this string. In the former case -path /home/admin/web/public_html/content will never be true, even if realpath ./ prints /home/admin/web/public_html, because the relevant directory will be identified by the string ./content and this is the string you would want to match with -path. In general you need to adjust the argument of -path to the starting location(s) (or use wildcards maybe).

• If you need to exclude multiple patterns then follow this example:

  find . \
     -path ./content -prune \
     -o -path ./foo/bar -prune \
     -o -path '*/baz' -prune \
     -o -exec chown admin {} +
  

  which can be compacted to

  find . \
     \( -path ./content \
        -o -path ./foo/bar \
        -o -path '*/baz' \
     \) -prune \
     -o -exec chown admin {} +
  

  where parentheses are important.

  With -regex you may be able to combine multiple patterns into one (example). This test is not required by POSIX though.

• Other tests (e.g. -name or even -exec) can be used to exclude files.

Answer 3

You can exclude directories by using !(enumeration_of_directories) notation. Example removing media and logs from chown

chown -R myuser:mygroup /www/myapp/!(media|logs)

Answer 4

find . -type d -not -path /home/admin/web/public_html  -prune -o -print0 | xargs -0 chown admin 

Where -type d filter by directory and -not -path /home/admin/web/public_html exclude the directory.

Answer 5

A somewhat unconventional approach: firejail.

Firejail is a SUID program that reduces the risk of security breaches by restricting the running environment of untrusted applications using Linux namespaces and seccomp-bpf. It allows a process and all its descendants to have their own private view of the globally shared kernel resources, such as the network stack, process table, mount table.

firejail --noprofile --quiet --blacklist=/home/admin/web/public_html/content chown -R admin /home/admin/web/public_html

It's a quite convenient generic way to protect some file(s). In this case, if /home/admin/web/public_html/content is a directory then chown will see an empty "impostor directory" instead. The tool will be able to act on it, so there will be no error. The real directory will stay unaffected.

There's a quirk: if chown is /bin/chown and you blacklist /bin/chown or /bin then chown will not run. In such case consider --read-only instead of --blacklist. See man 1 firejail for details.

From sudo firejail … chown … and firejail … sudo chown … I would prefer the latter.

Answer 6

for chown -R exclude subdirectory,but not the parent directory self

eg:

find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 \( -path ./node_modules \) -prune -o -print0 |xargs -0 chown -R www-data:www-data

exclude . and chown subdirectories and files exclude 'node_modules' folder.

Answer 7

from /home/admin/web/public_html

find . ! -name "content" | xargs -I {} chown admin {}

should work fine, hope it helps you