Look it does advertise itself as not tracking user's historical selections, and so this is a rational paranoid feeling to think that it knows my sexual preference. Well in terms of gender anyway.
Other explanations?
Asked
Active
Viewed 76 times
-3
-
Websites and webapps belong on [webapps.se] but this is more of a misunderstanding that certain phrases have different meanings based on context per the answer below. – Mokubai Aug 29 '19 at 08:44
1 Answers
2
To pin out is to fasten a paper pattern to material before cutting.
Hanlon's Razor says
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Pick a better search engine.
BTW, Google does the same thing, but they start further down the page
Tetsujin
- 47,296
- 8
- 108
- 135
-
Well ok it's not like I actually care I mean my data is only going to be a statisticians worst nightmare I can only assume but scepticism of text based statements should not be attributed to suspicion of malice Sir – Adam Ledger Aug 29 '19 at 10:20
-
-
If you attribute paranoia, you imply malice; if it's not malicious, why be paranoid about it?… which is beside the point. That's the wording of Hanlon's razor, unadulterated. – Tetsujin Aug 29 '19 at 10:49
-
I'm not disputing the truth value of your initial statement, but this one I do. Paranoia is simply scepticism that is yet to be refined into a conclusion with vagaries still flawing any assertion, malice cannot be implied by it, it isn't a directive towards any specific entity – Adam Ledger Aug 29 '19 at 12:48
-
It's not like I have a detailed knowledge of every individual that is involved with the software I use, mate, come on if malice was what I sought to prove I've chosen a very obscure way to go about it for the past few decades – Adam Ledger Aug 29 '19 at 12:51
-
I have sporadic and or no control over my maturity levels, especially in text based interaction. This is a key note of the presentation I think. – Adam Ledger Aug 29 '19 at 12:58