170

In Unix (Tru64), how do I make the ls command show the file size in megabytes? Currently I am able to show it in bytes using the following:

ls -la
phuclv
  • 26,555
  • 15
  • 113
  • 235

10 Answers10

272

Maybe -h is sufficient for you:

-h
When used with the -l option, use unit suffixes: Byte, Kilobyte, Megabyte, Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte in order to reduce the number of digits to three or less using base 2 for sizes.

ls -lah

General advice: Use man commandname to read the manual/help of a certain command, e.g. here man ls.

Felix
  • 4,441
  • 1
  • 19
  • 10
34

ls --block-size=M prints the sizes in Megabytes but shows 1MB also for anything below 1 MB. I'm unsure if this option is acceptable in your UNIX version of ls, though.

Actually ls -lh also prints sizes in Gigabytes if the file is big enough (Well anyways: on Linux 64bit this does work :>)

On a side node: du -sh * prints also directory sizes in current directory.

Jan.
  • 451
  • 3
  • 2
  • Thanks! I needed to monitor live file changes in a folder and using `ls -h` is meaningless after a file grows over 1GB, so I use this command in a 1 second loop: `while true ; do ls -al --block-size=M ; sleep 1 ; done` – ccpizza Mar 19 '16 at 13:13
16

You will have to use awk to do the math for you:

ls -l | awk 'BEGIN{mega=1048576} $5 >= mega {$5 = $5/mega "MB"} {print}'

This won't affect the output for files that are smaller than mega.

You may need to adjust the field number to match the way your ls is laid out. You can change mega to "1000000" if that is your preference.

This will print more decimal places than you probably want. You could implement a rounding function.

Dennis Williamson
  • 106,229
  • 19
  • 167
  • 187
  • 3
    Much less elegant than `ls -lh` or `ls --block-size=M`, but AWK is very useful! – Statwonk Sep 28 '14 at 14:50
  • 2
    Just what I needed. All the other solutions round to the nearest MB but this shows a few decimal places and is easily customizable. – zeroimpl Oct 17 '14 at 00:02
  • 3
    This is a nice solution for those systems (AIX - I am looking at you) that do not have the -h option. – Buggabill Nov 18 '15 at 13:22
13

try ls -shR for recursive human readable format.

Sorter
  • 421
  • 1
  • 6
  • 9
  • 4
    [OP has stated that there is no `-h` on Tru64](http://superuser.com/questions/190653/ls-command-how-to-print-file-size-in-megabytes#comment193423_190654), and did so over two years before this answer was posted. – user Oct 11 '13 at 09:02
  • 3
    Thought It's my responsibility to help those who reach here with the same google search. – Sorter Feb 22 '17 at 17:52
9

try ls -lash, it prints sizes in human readable format

n0pe
  • 16,472
  • 18
  • 71
  • 102
5

du -sm filename.txt

Ether
  • 1,127
  • 3
  • 11
  • 19
5

You can also type

du -sh ./*

This will list all the folders under current directory, with human-readable format, including the more familiar file sizes in Kb, Mb, Gb.

Wes Sayeed
  • 13,662
  • 6
  • 41
  • 76
Keng
  • 151
  • 1
  • 1
  • In [that reply](https://superuser.com/a/633214) was posted a `du` implementation, that can show sizes in human readable format with 3 decimals: `du -Lsbc * | awk 'function hr(bytes) {hum[1024**4]="TiB";hum[1024**3]="GiB";hum[1024**2]="MiB";hum[1024]="kiB";for (x = 1024**4; x >= 1024; x /= 1024) {if (bytes >= x) {return sprintf("%8.3f %s", bytes/x, hum[x]);}}return sprintf("%4d B", bytes);}{print hr($1) "\t" $2}'` – Kyo Dec 24 '22 at 14:17
2

If you just want the size of only a specific file, then the command, a trivial extrapolation of the previous answers, is:

ls -sh filename(s)

-s is for size and the h is for Human Readable (as mentioned above a few times).

The output will look like this:

753M myfilename

If you leave out the filename(s), it'll list the directory, placing the size of each file next to its name — not unlike what ls -la does when invoked with no filename arguments.

Hope this helps.

Rob Jones
  • 29
  • 2
2
ls -l --block-size=MB 

For the --block-size parameter:

  • use MB for 10^6
  • use just M for 2^20
I say Reinstate Monica
  • 25,487
  • 19
  • 95
  • 131
Evan
  • 121
  • 3
  • Note that this **won't show any decimal places**. Also, **anything above 0 kB but nor greater than 1 MB will be shown as `1MB`**. For this reason I found `ls -l --block-size=kB` to be more useful. – DaAwesomeP Oct 26 '15 at 02:31
0

If you're just interested in the file size, and you don't have to use the ls command, try the following:

# echo "Hello World" > file.txt
# ls -l file.txt 
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user 12 Mar 10 11:32 file.txt
# stat --printf='%s\n' file.txt
12

This will print the file size without the need to parse anything.

SKN
  • 1
  • OP want size in MB, maybe a stat option will produce size in human readable form ? – Archemar Mar 12 '16 at 10:47
  • Ah, that was dumb of me. Thanks for catching that. stat does not have an option to manipulate the size using --printf or any other option as far as I know. It would likely require using a combination of printf and bc command-line utilities. In which case, why bother. ls and cut/awk would be quicker. – SKN Apr 23 '16 at 21:42