1

I have a file I've called æøå.js (just an example), and when I run ls in the directory where it's stored I get

root@chu:~/projects/someproject/server# ls src
a.js  b.js  ??????.js

So it seems such symbols can't be displayed. PuTTY is set to expect UTF-8, and my env looks like this

TERM=xterm
SHELL=/bin/bash
USER=root
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHLVL=1
HOME=/root
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
LS_OPTIONS=--color=auto
PYTHONPATH=:/root/pymodules
LOGNAME=root
_=/usr/bin/env

(I've removed some stuff from that output since they can't possibly be relevant anyway)

But here's the thing; When I open a file with vim then I can type and see all those symbols without a problem. So the problem is apparently just in the shell/bash. Are there any settings I can supply that will allow bash to display those symbols? Can someone also explain why it doesn't work now, with UTF-8?

Edit: This is how tree displays æøå.js

|-- src
|   |-- a.js
|   |-- b.js
|   `-- \303\246\303\270\303\245.js
Hubro
  • 5,716
  • 14
  • 61
  • 87

1 Answers1

8

As I already explained, twice, in our earlier discussion, the problem is that your locale configuration is pointing to a nonexistent locale.

Your environment including $LANG is okay; however, the en_GB.UTF-8 locale must be generated.

On most distributions (including Debian):

  1. Open /etc/locale.gen in a text editor.
  2. Uncomment the en_GB.UTF-8 line by removing the leading #.
  3. Run locale-gen as root.

On Debian:

  1. Run dpkg-reconfigure locales as root.
  2. Scroll down to the "en_GB.UTF-8" entry, mark it with Space.
  3. Select OK with Tab, Enter.

Also, for the record, ls is a separate program; it is not part of bash.

Community
  • 1
u1686_grawity
  • 426,297
  • 64
  • 894
  • 966
  • Ah yes, I didn't think this question was related. Also I asked this question before you solved my previous one :-) `ls` displays the symbols correctly now and I'll mark your answer as correct. `tree` however, working correctly in every other way, displays the file as `\303\246\303\270\303\245.js`. Is that fixable? – Hubro Jan 14 '12 at 20:04
  • *That* might depend on the version of `tree`, actually. I compiled [1.6.0](http://mama.indstate.edu/users/ice/tree/src/tree-1.6.0.tgz) (latest) and 1.5.3 (Debian squeeze) on the same system, and 1.6.0 displays Unicode while 1.5.3 uses octal. – u1686_grawity Jan 14 '12 at 20:29
  • Good catch. I installed version 1.6.0 and it displays everything correctly. Thanks a million once again for your help! :-) – Hubro Jan 14 '12 at 20:37